Most Christians teach that Paul in Romans 7:14-25 is referring to his seemingly hopeless struggles against sin as a Christian believer.

Personally, I have found this interpretation to be discouraging to the Christian who is desirous to walk worthy of his calling. It also seems to completely contradict the surrounding passages in chapters 6 and 8 of the same letter, and to be completely out of character with the rest of the writings of Paul in the New Testament.

Instead, it would appear to me that Paul is continuing his explanation from the first thirteen verses of the chapter which describes the relationship between indwelling Sin, the Law of God and the Carnal (unregenerate) man. When he uses the personal pronoun “I”, he is posing in the first person as a representative of unregenerate humanity. Verse 14 says “For we know that the law is spiritual, but I am carnal, sold into bondage to sin”. The notion that a Christian believer who has DIED to sin, been FREED from sin and has been REDEEMED from sin, as we read everywhere else in the New Testament would be described as being “sold into bondage to sin”, is to me an irreconcilable contradiction.

Then in verse 23, after 8 eight verses of excruciatingly describing his complete inability to do what is right and powerlessness to refrain from evil (which again, if applied to a believer, totally contradicts EVERYTHING Paul has written in all of his epistles), Paul says “but I see a different law in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind, and MAKING ME A PRISONER OF THE LAW OF SIN which is in my members”. Somebody please explain to me how it is possible for Paul to be describing himself as a Christian as being a “prisoner of the law of sin”, and then, exactly four verses later, in Romans 8:2, he says (to his Christian audience), “For the law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus has SET YOU FREE FROM THE LAW OF SIN and death”. So for crying out loud, which is it??? It can’t be both — sorry — not according to the laws of logic. The Christian is either FREE from the law of sin or he is a PRISONER to the law of sin. Which is it? Romans 6:14 says “For sin shall not be master over you…” then Romans 7:19 says “For the good that I want I do not do, but I practice the very evil that I do not want”, in essence, saying “sin IS master over me”. Paul is either describing the plight of the unregenerate man in Romans 7, or he is suffering from the worst kind of bipolar disorder known to man.

I understand the principle of sanctification, wherein a Christian believer is purified and made mature in this life through suffering and trials and learning by faith to please the Lord. I understand that no Christian believer in this life can make the claim that he has already been perfected. I understand that we are awaiting the redemption and transformation of our bodies that will happen after Christ’s return. However, I don’t think that there is evidence that Paul is referring to any of these things in this particular passage.

People claim to find “hope” in this passage, even with the classic interpretation. They say things like “well if Paul himself had these struggles with sin, then I should be encouraged! It’s OK that I too am living a defeated life. In fact, that is what is expected…” WHAT??? I’ll be the first to admit that Christians can and do sin, and that there is plenteous grace under the blood of the glorious New Covenant to cover all of our sins, past, present and future. But living a life of defeat to sin is NOT God’s plan A for any believer. And our failures do NOT constitute a deficiency in the resurrection power of Christ that allows us as believers to overcome sin. If we’re being continually defeated by the same sin, it’s on us. The answer is not to go to Romans 7 and wallow in it thinking that Paul shared our plight as a believer and that some day in the sweet by and by we’ll be taken out of this body and then we’ll be free from this sin. That is the worst kind of defeatism and it says, essentially, that the gospel is too weak to have any positive effect in this life. My copy of Romans says that the gospel is THE POWER OF GOD. And God is not weak. And if His power lives in us, then we absolutely have the power, by faith, to do good things and say no to evil.

I’ve searched the New Testament high and low. While there are (thankfully) plenty of passages that proclaim the forgiveness, mercy and grace that are available to Christian believers IF they sin, there are ZERO statements that offer an EXCUSE for a Christian to sin. I fear that believers mistakenly turn to Romans 7 as an excuse for continuing a life of defeatedness. We should be looking for victory, not for excuses.

Here’s the 1990 Master’s Thesis of a theological student who seems to agree with me on this topic…

Let me start by saying that I am not worthy to call Kind David on anything.  I’m certain that the man after God’s own heart was more right in his life than I will ever be.  Having said that, my recent readings were a bit confusing.

We all are all aware that while King Saul was alive, even though David was anointed King, he refused to raise his hand against King Saul, even though he was fleeing him for his life.  Once Saul commits suicide on the battlefield, we see an amalekite claim that he killed Saul come and brag to David about it, and is killed on the spot because of David’s insistence on this principle.  We also see a repeat of this behavior when Saul’s son Ishbosheth is slain by Rechab and Baanah.

Between these two events however, Joab murders Abner in delayed retribution for killing of his brother.  While David mourned this loss, and cursed Joab and his family, he apparently did not execute any discipline on this close friend and general.

What do you think? Did he show too much favoritism towards Joab?  Was this an indication of difficulty dealing with his close friends, and later his sons?  How would we react in the same situation?  What would have been a better response?